G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 regulates mitochondrial bioenergetics and impairs myostatin-mediated autophagy in muscle cells

G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) is an important protein involved in β-adrenergic receptor desensitization. In addition, studies have shown GRK2 can modulate different metabolic processes in the cell. For instance, GRK2 has been recently shown to promote mitochondrial biogenesis and increase ATP production. However, the role of GRK2 in skeletal muscle and the signaling mechanisms that regulate GRK2 remain poorly understood. Myostatin is a well-known myokine that has been shown to impair mitochondria function. Here, we have assessed the role of myostatin in regulating GRK2 and the subsequent downstream effect of myostatin regulation of GRK2 on mitochondrial respiration in skeletal muscle. Myostatin treatment promoted the loss of GRK2 protein in myoblasts and myotubes in a time- and dose-dependent manner, which we suggest was through enhanced ubiquitin-mediated protein loss, as treatment with proteasome inhibitors partially rescued myostatin-mediated loss of GRK2 protein. To evaluate the effects of GRK2 on mitochondrial respiration, we generated stable myoblast lines that overexpress GRK2. Stable overexpression of GRK2 resulted in increased mitochondrial content and enhanced mitochondrial/oxidative respiration. Interestingly, although overexpression of GRK2 was unable to prevent myostatin-mediated impairment of mitochondrial respiratory function, elevated levels of GRK2 blocked the increased autophagic flux observed following treatment with myostatin. Overall, our data suggest a novel role for GRK2 in regulating mitochondria mass and mitochondrial respiration in skeletal muscle

Mechanism of Neuroprotective Mitochondrial Remodeling by PKA/AKAP1

The mitochondrial signaling complex PKA/AKAP1 protects neurons against mitochondrial fragmentation and cell death by phosphorylating and inactivating the mitochondrial fission enzyme Drp1

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure fl ux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defi ned as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (inmost higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium ) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the fi eld understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation it is imperative to delete or knock down more than one autophagy-related gene. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways so not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

Intranasal Administration of Forskolin and Noopept Reverses Parkinsonian Pathology in PINK1 Knockout Rats

Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a brain-degenerative disorder characterized by a progressive loss of midbrain dopamine neurons. Current standard-of-care includes oral administration of Levodopa to address motor symptoms, but this treatment is not disease-modifying. A reduction in Protein Kinase A (PKA) signaling and neurotrophic support contributes to PD pathology. We previously showed that enhancing PKA activity in the brain via intraperitoneal administration of Forskolin in Parkinsonian rats (PINK1 knockout) abrogate motor symptoms and loss of midbrain dopamine neurons. Given that intraperitoneal administration is invasive, we hypothesized that intranasal administration of Forskolin and a second nootropic agent (Noopept) could reverse PD pathology efficiently. Results show that intranasal administration of a formulation (CNS/CT-001) containing Forskolin (10 µM) and Noopept (20 nM) significantly reversed motor symptoms, loss of hind limb strength, and neurodegeneration of midbrain dopamine neurons in PINK1-KO rats and is indistinguishable from wild-type (WT) rats; therapeutic effects associated with increased PKA activity and levels of BDNF and NGF in the brain. Intranasal administration of CNS/CT-001, but not Forskolin, significantly decreased the number of α-synuclein aggregates in the cortex of PINK1-KO rats, and is indistinguishable from WT rats. Overall, we show proof of concept that intranasal administration of CNS/CT-001 is a non-invasive, disease-modifying formulation for PD

Role of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Degenerative Brain Diseases, an Overview

Mitochondria are multifaceted organelles that serve to power critical neuronal functions. Additionally, mitochondria buffer calcium, produce intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), act as heat generators, regulate lipid metabolism, and modulate cell survival.Unlike proliferating cells, neurons predominantly rely on oxidative phosphorylation to thrive and establish neuronal networks. Although the brain comprises less than 2% of human body weight, it consumes of up to 20% of the total energy levels produced by the body. Indeed, the high reliance of neurons on oxidative phosphorylation is evident as mitochondrial dysfunction underlies the etiology of a many neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Huntington’s disease (HD), optic neuropathy (ON), Marie-Charcot-Tooth (MCT) disease, and Parkinson’s disease (PD) [1,2,3,4]. In addition, several studies using cell culture and in vivo models have provided convincing proof-of-concept that high quality/functional mitochondria are critical for neuronal survival.A mouse model that expresses a dysfunctional mitochondrial transcription factor (TFAM) (Mito-Park) faithfully recapitulates several aspects of PD pathology, including a significant loss of midbrain dopamine neurons, deficits in neurotransmitter levels, and loss of motor movement [11]. In neurodegenerative diseases, it is important to bear in mind that damaged mitochondria are not only characterized as unable to produce a sufficient level of ATP via oxidative phosphorylation, but are also impaired for movement (trafficking), incapable to undergo efficient fission or fusion, mitochondrial turnover (mitophagy) or be replaced via mitochondrial biogenesis. Each of these features of mitochondrial dysfunction is further elaborated below. Therefore, elevating mitochondrial function is a viable therapeutic strategy for reversing neurodegeneration in neurodegenerative diseases associated with mitochondrial dysfunction

Intranasal Administration of Forskolin and Noopept Reverses Parkinsonian Pathology in PINK1 Knockout Rats

Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a brain-degenerative disorder characterized by a progressive loss of midbrain dopamine neurons. Current standard-of-care includes oral administration of Levodopa to address motor symptoms, but this treatment is not disease-modifying. A reduction in Protein Kinase A (PKA) signaling and neurotrophic support contributes to PD pathology. We previously showed that enhancing PKA activity in the brain via intraperitoneal administration of Forskolin in Parkinsonian rats (PINK1 knockout) abrogate motor symptoms and loss of midbrain dopamine neurons. Given that intraperitoneal administration is invasive, we hypothesized that intranasal administration of Forskolin and a second nootropic agent (Noopept) could reverse PD pathology efficiently. Results show that intranasal administration of a formulation (CNS/CT-001) containing Forskolin (10 µM) and Noopept (20 nM) significantly reversed motor symptoms, loss of hind limb strength, and neurodegeneration of midbrain dopamine neurons in PINK1-KO rats and is indistinguishable from wild-type (WT) rats; therapeutic effects associated with increased PKA activity and levels of BDNF and NGF in the brain. Intranasal administration of CNS/CT-001, but not Forskolin, significantly decreased the number of α-synuclein aggregates in the cortex of PINK1-KO rats, and is indistinguishable from WT rats. Overall, we show proof of concept that intranasal administration of CNS/CT-001 is a non-invasive, disease-modifying formulation for PD

Mitochondrial O-GlcNAc Transferase (mOGT) Regulates Mitochondrial Structure, Function, and Survival in HeLa Cells

O-Linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase (OGT) catalyzes O-GlcNAcylation of target proteins and regulates numerous biological processes. OGT is encoded by a single gene that yields nucleocytosolic and mitochondrial isoforms. To date, the role of the mitochondrial isoform of OGT (mOGT) remains largely unknown. Using high throughput proteomics, we identified 84 candidate mitochondrial glycoproteins, of which 44 are novel. Notably, two of the candidate glycoproteins identified (cytochrome oxidase 2 (COX2) and NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase core subunit 4 (MT-ND4)) are encoded by mitochondrial DNA. Using siRNA in HeLa cells, we found that reducing endogenous mOGT expression leads to alterations in mitochondrial structure and function, including Drp1-dependent mitochondrial fragmentation, reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential, and a significant loss of mitochondrial content in the absence of mitochondrial ROS. These defects are associated with a compensatory increase in oxidative phosphorylation per mitochondrion. mOGT is also critical for cell survivals iRNA-mediated knockdown of endogenous mOGT protected cells against toxicity mediated by rotenone, a complex I inhibitor. Conversely, reduced expression of both nucleocytoplasmic (ncOGT) and mitochondrial (mOGT) OGT isoforms is associated with increased mitochondrial respiration and elevated glycolysis, suggesting that ncOGT is a negative regulator of cellular bioenergetics. Last, we determined thatmOGTis probably involved in the glycosylation of a restricted set of mitochondrial targets. Weidentified four proteins implicated in mitochondrial biogenesis and metabolism regulation as candidate substrates of mOGT, includ-ing leucine-rich PPR-containing protein and mitochondrial aconitate hydratase. Our findings suggest that mOGT is catalytically active in vivo and supports mitochondrial structure, health, and survival, whereas ncOGT predominantly regulates cellular bioenergetics

How AMPK and PKA Interplay to Regulate Mitochondrial Function and Survival in Models of Ischemia and Diabetes

Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a conserved, redox-activated master regulator of cell metabolism. In the presence of oxidative stress, AMPK promotes cytoprotection by enhancing the conservation of energy by suppressing protein translation and by stimulating autophagy. AMPK interplays with protein kinase A (PKA) to regulate oxidative stress, mitochondrial function, and cell survival. AMPK and dual-specificity A-kinase anchoring protein 1 (D-AKAP1), a mitochondrial-directed scaffold of PKA, interact to regulate mitochondrial function and oxidative stress in cardiac and endothelial cells. Ischemia and diabetes, a chronic disease that increases the onset of cardiovascular diseases, suppress the cardioprotective effects of AMPK and PKA. Here, we review the molecular mechanisms by which AMPK and D-AKAP1/PKA interplay to regulate mitochondrial function, oxidative stress, and signaling pathways that prime endothelial cells, cardiac cells, and neurons for cytoprotection against oxidative stress. We discuss recent literature showing how temporal dynamics and localization of activated AMPK and PKA holoenzymes play a crucial role in governing cellular bioenergetics and cell survival in models of ischemia, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes. Finally, we propose therapeutic strategies that tout localized PKA and AMPK signaling to reverse mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and death of neurons and cardiac and endothelial cells during ischemia and diabetes